Every once in a while, a play comes along that really makes you think. "Skin Of Our Teeth", Thornton WIlder's Pulitzer Prize-winner (in what must have been a VERY slow year for plays), now playing at GCP, is one such play. Specifically, it made me think words to the effect of, "What the *hell* is going on here?" The play, as far as I can tell, is about the Antrobus family, who are not so much a family as they are an abstraction of humanity. A sort of Everyman of human history and evolution, if you will. Or maybe they're just a bunch of typical schmucks from Jersey. I don't think I was able to fully grasp the potential meaning of the play because I was not under the influence of various illegal substances at the time I viewed it. The show claims to be a "comedy", but I couldn't detect a single trace of humor anywhere, even in the parts that seemed like they were supposed to be funny. It's hard to tell whether this is because of bad direction or just a bad script. The play in its entirety is clearly supposed to be a satire of human nature, but it just doesn't play. You don't get the sense that the actors are playing it as a satire, so it doesn't work. And the lines themselves aren't inherently funny for the most part, so it's impossible to just deadpan through them and get comedy out of it, a la Leslie Nielsen. I'd give you a plot recap at this point, but there are 2 problems: 1. I don't remember what the plot was. 2. I don't think there actually was one. Pretty much all I remember is that the most likeable characters were the dinosaur and the mammoth, and they were killed off in Act One. The play just went downhill from there. No, actually, it went into a sinkhole, because 'downhill' implies that there was an 'uphill' at some point, and there really wasn't..... Although the production wasn't all bad. There were several very nice performances..... Susan Cristophy as Maggie Antrobus does a very nice job and tries her best to carry the show, but 3 dozen freight trains with booster rockets couldn't carry this show. My favorite performance of the evening was turned in by Rachel Moulton as Gladys. Like Shannon Wright in "George M!", Rachel's facial expressions are a show all by themself. Alex Braddy is very good as the Fortune Teller, although a lot of the time I wasn't sure if she was taking dramatic pauses or trying to remember her lines. Tequila Brooks as Sabina the Maid does pretty well, but could've been a little stronger. The parts when she steps out of character to do her little stand up routine about how the play sucks aren't very convincing, because she doesn't seem to step far enough out of her character (or she doesn't go into her character enough to begin with). Robert Brown as George Antrobus gives a solid, but somewhat uninspired, performance Aaron Kirkpatrick as Henry Antrobus does just fine, but I'm still trying to figure out why the directors cast him and not Ken Foote for this part. It's kind of like letting your utility infielder bat clean-up while you send Ken Griffey Jr. down to the 7-11 to pick up some more ice for the cooler...... MISCELLANY -I'm still trying to figure out what I thought of the set. Probably because I'm still waiting for the rest of it to be built. The collapsing (well, okay, LEANING) wall was nice, but why worry about one wall falling down when the whole rest of your house has 3-foot gaps with no walls at all. -I don't know who painted the booths for the carnival scene, but they really could stand to be jazzed up a bit. -I don't know about GCP's new halftime refreshment policy either. It's a better idea than the old system, but they could probably stand a bit more variety in the way of food and drink. I'd rather pay my dollar and load up on Oreos than get a packaged Rice Krispie Treat (tm). -The program cover for the show was designed by one "Cristine Antalak". Our researchers are currently studying what that name can be anagrammed into. -Helping with set construction, according to the program, was someone named "Penelope Scordalakes". I think they got that from the Random Wench-Name Generator(tm), and stuck it in the program to see if anyone was paying attention. Also helping on the set was Connor Button, who mostly operated the circular saw. -I don't know what the exact box office numbers are for this show, but they've got to be the lowest in a long time, even for a straight show. I'm a little surprised that this show was approved by the GCP board in the first place, because you could've seen a low box office for this show coming from a mile away. A no-name, intellectual straight show? Isn't that what the ART is for??? FINAL ANALYSIS I have to give this production a thumbs down. The few good individual performances don't make up for the overall feeling of confusion and total lack of humor. If you do go, a good way to keep yourself entertained is to count the audience at the beginning of each act, and calculate the "audience shrinkage" factor as the play goes on. -john