Continuing our new, soon-to-be-discontinued tradition of reviewing shows that have already closed, it's time to look back at GCP's production of The King and I--the classic musical written by....um, let me just check the cover of the program for a second........ hmmm, well the names of the authors don't seem to be listed on the cover of the program, but it does say in a good-sized font that the show was "Designed and Directed by William J. Eyerly, Jr," so that's probably the information that really matters. Anyway, The King And I is the classic story of Anna Leonowens, an English woman who travels to Siam to teach the King's stable of children and comes to learn that--despite their differences--all of them are the same deep down. Specifically, all of them are really, really, REALLY white.... Fortunately, the lead characters in the show are good, as are a few of the supporting characters; but after that, the talent curve takes a sharp downward drop. Janice Kaplan as Anna is good--not necessarily great, but still good. She tended to lose too much volume on some of the higher songs, but her acting was fine, as was her English accent. Bobby McAfee as the King also does a respectable job. I don't think he completely nailed the Asian accent, but he got close enough to be convincing, especially compared to the rest of the cast. Gayla Vidal as Tuptim did very well, and Jimmy Resczenski as Anna's son Louis wasn't bad. Apart from them, the ensemble cast was just not very good. The singing was very good, but most of the ensemble cast seemed to fall into one of two categories: -Can sing well, but can't act at all -Can sing well , can sort of act, but not in an Asian accent. It made me think that people were cast in this show based solely on their singing ability--which works fine for a chorus, I suppose, but not for major supporting roles. Admittedly, I wasn't at the auditions, so I don't know what the director had to work with; but the way it turned out just did not work at all. You had a couple people who could do the Asian accent, some who tried to do it and failed, and some who didn't bother trying at all. And truly, there was at least one person--I won't mention any names--in a major supporting role whose acting was just plain bad. Just to clarify, I'm not saying every single person in the ensemble cast was bad. There were quite a few whom I have no opinion on, because they didn't do enough to be especially noticeable. Plus, there were a lot of kids in the show whose main function was basically as set pieces. The one kid who did anything was the King's oldest son, who was perhaps too authentic, because he seemed to be speaking some language I didn't understand. Although this probably didn't matter to 95% of the theatre-going public, who inexplicably equate cuteness with quality. Despite what you may be thinking by now, it was not a horrible show. Most of the action centered around the leads, who were pretty good. And the show itself is decent through the first act, though it starts to go downhill in Act II, which featured a play-within-a-play based on Uncle Tom's Cabin where white children wear black-children masks that actually offended a black person I was standing near who is not easily offended. I was offended, too, but that was mostly because the whole play-within-a-play scene was inane and wasted about 15 minutes of my life that I'll never get back. Final Verdict: GCP's The King And I was a decent show with good leads that suffers from a subpar supporting cast. If it were still playing, I'd say it might be worth a couple hours of your time, although I don't know that it would be worth the 10 bucks to get in. Not that it would've mattered, since I think the show pretty much sold out most of the time. Go figure. One day, when I'm overly rich, I'm going to build my own theatre and endow it with enough money to be able to put on entire seasons of shows that didn't have movies based on them. I don't know how I'll get the money yet, but I do know that the theatre won't be built anywhere near Gainesville..... -john